Photo: Ray Terrill / CC BY-SA 2.0Utah Royals FC
All stats through July 31, 2026
Original 2018-2020 run; re-established as expansion club in 2024
Open in Maps →Utah Royals FC, ranked 3rd of 16 and 2 points ahead of Portland Thorns FC, are favored to win 51% of the time, with a model projecting a tight, low-scoring game (Utah Royals FC 1.60, Portland Thorns FC 1.11). The model expects Utah Royals FC to secure a 1-0 victory, but the match could end in a draw or a Portland Thorns FC win, with the latter being the least likely outcome.
Everything runs through the midfield, 4th of 16.
- Last 5: LLWWL, 6 points.
Play Style
Where this club sits vs the league, 0 to 100 on five style axes.Attack = xG created · Defense = solidity · Pace = openness · Press = ball-winning · Build-up = passing volume.
0–100 percentile vs the league this season · the tick marks 50 (league average).
Depth Chart
Every player who featured, grouped by line and ranked by minutes. Click a card for the full report.Attack
6Strikers and wide forwards, the final third.
Midfield
5Attacking, central and defensive mids, the engine room.
Defense
7Full-backs and center-backs, the back line.
Goal
2Goalkeepers, the last line. Rated on the GK goals-added model.
Goals-Added Radars
Click any card for the full scouting report.Sortable Table
| Player | Pos | Min | Total g+ /90 | pct |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ST | 1239 | 0.32 | 88 | |
| FB | 581 | 0.15 | 82 | |
| AM | 1243 | 0.26 | 81 | |
| Dayana Louis | DM | 397 | 0.12 | 77 |
| DM | 1390 | 0.11 | 70 | |
| DM | 312 | 0.10 | 67 | |
| W | 1566 | 0.22 | 64 | |
| CB | 1737 | 0.11 | 58 | |
| ST | 1232 | 0.23 | 57 | |
| FB | 1039 | 0.11 | 54 | |
| FB | 824 | 0.10 | 48 | |
| W | 420 | 0.18 | 44 | |
| CB | 1011 | 0.09 | 39 | |
| DM | 1155 | 0.07 | 36 | |
| ST | 509 | 0.15 | 19 | |
| FB | 311 | 0.06 | 15 | |
| CB | 1221 | 0.04 | 12 | |
| W | 492 | 0.07 | 3 | |
| GK | 1147 | — | n/a | |
| GK | 590 | — | n/a |